No. 20-1752
Devar Hurd v. Stacey Fredenburgh
Amici (1)
Experienced Counsel
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-deprivation due-process eighth-amendment fourteenth-amendment liberty-interest prolonged-incarceration qualified-immunity
Latest Conference:
2021-09-27
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Whether prolonged incarceration past a statutorily-mandated release date is an objectively serious deprivation under clearly established Eighth Amendment law.
2. Whether there is a liberty interest in avoiding prolonged incarceration past a statutorily-mandated release date under clearly established Fourteenth Amendment law.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether prolonged incarceration past a release date is an objectively serious deprivation under clearly established Eighth Amendment law
Docket Entries
2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-09-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-08-31
Reply of petitioner Devar Hurd filed. (Distributed)
2021-08-16
Brief of respondent Stacey Fredenburgh, in her individual capacity in opposition filed.
2021-07-16
Brief amicus curiae of Cato Institute filed.
2021-06-29
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including August 16, 2021.
2021-06-28
Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 16, 2021 to August 16, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-06-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 16, 2021)
Attorneys
Cato Institute
Jay Remington Schweikert — The Cato Institute, Amicus
Devar Hurd
David Michael Shapiro — Petitioner
Stacey Fredenburgh, in her individual capacity
Barbara Dale Underwood — Solicitor General, Respondent