No. 20-1703

Martin Dekom v. Federal National Mortgage Association, et al.

Lower Court: Second Circuit
Docketed: 2021-06-08
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights due-process equal-protection foreclosure-procedure judicial-authority judicial-usurpation mortgage-fraud rooker-feldman-doctrine second-amendment standing
Key Terms:
SecondAmendment DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2021-09-27
Question Presented (from Petition)

Can courts alleviate their backlog by letting staffers usurp the authority of judges?

Is the Rooker-Feldman doctrine a safe harbor for fraud?

Can costs be levied after a mandate, and when a party admits their taxation is false?

Can courts implement shortcuts based on class without implicating the Second Amendment?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Can courts alleviate their backlog by letting staffers usurp the authority of judges?

Docket Entries

2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-07-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-06-30
Waiver of right of respondent Coschignano, Riccio, Cozzens, Adams, Pech, Brandt, Agostino, Joseph, Eng, Sheinkman, 8 Motion Clerks, and 2nd Dept Appellate Judges to respond filed.
Main Document
2021-06-21
Waiver of right of respondents Berkman, Henoch Law Firm; Erik Vallely and Matthew Burrows to respond filed.
Main Document
2021-06-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 8, 2021)
PetitionAppendix

Attorneys

Berkman, Henoch Law Firm; Erik Vallely and Matthew Burrows
Joseph E. Macy — Berkman, Henoch, Peterson, Peddy & Fenchel, P.C., Respondent
Coschignano, Riccio, Cozzens, Adams, Pech, Brandt, Agostino, Joseph, Eng, Sheinkman, 8 Motion Clerks, and 2nd Dept Appellate Judges
Barbara Dale Underwood — Solicitor General, Respondent
Martin Dekom
Martin Dekom — Petitioner