1. Whether the Court of Appeals committed reversible error when it denied Petitioner's Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 24(a) motion to intervene as a matter of right into Fetai v. Midland Credit Management, Inc.

2. Whether the District Court committed reversible error when it denied Petitioner's Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 24(b) motion to permissively intervene into Fetai v. Midland Credit Management, Inc.

3. Whether the District Court abused its discretion when it determined that Petitioner's motion to intervene as a matter of right was untimely.

4. Whether the District Court's denial of Petitioner's motion to intervene as a matter of right denied him recovery to his "significantly protectable interest," protected under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 24(a), constituted a violation of Petitioner's procedural due process rights under the 5th and 14th Amendments of the United States Constitution.

Whether the Court of Appeals committed reversible error when it denied Petitioner's Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 24(a) motion to intervene as a matter of right