No. 20-1663
Matthew D. Norwood v. United States
Response Waived
Tags: criminal-procedure evidence evidence-rule forensic-interview hearsay hearsay-exception jury-deliberation prior-consistent-statement repetition trial-procedure truth-effect witness-testimony
Latest Conference:
2021-06-24
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether admission of a recorded hearsay statement as a physical exhibit, permitted to be reviewed during deliberations, is a fair application of the exclusions and exceptions to the prohibition of hearsay.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether admission of a recorded hearsay statement as a physical exhibit, permitted to be reviewed during deliberations, is a fair application of the exclusions and exceptions to the prohibition of hearsay
Docket Entries
2021-06-28
Petition DENIED.
2021-06-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/24/2021.
2021-06-03
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-05-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 28, 2021)
Attorneys
Matthew Norwood, Machinist Mate Nuclear First Class Petty Officer, USN
Christopher Kevin Riedel — U.S. Navy JAG Corps, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent