No. 20-1627
Amici (3)
Tags: child-custody content-based content-based-restriction first-amendment free-press free-speech gag-order overbreadth prior-restraint vagueness
Latest Conference:
2021-09-27
Question Presented (from Petition)
Is such a "gag order" an unconstitutionally vague and overbroad prior restraint and content-based restriction violating Petitioners' First Amendment free speech rights?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Is such a 'gag order' an unconstitutionally vague and overbroad prior restraint and content-based restriction violating Petitioners' First Amendment free-speech
Docket Entries
2021-10-04
Motion for leave to file amici brief out of time filed by Women's and Children's Advocacy Project, et al. DENIED.
2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-09-14
Reply of petitioners Ducote, et al. filed. (Distributed)
2021-08-17
Motion for leave to file amici brief out of time filed by Women's and Children's Advocacy Project, et al. (Distributed)
2021-06-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-06-17
Motion of Jane Bambauer, et al. for leave to file and brief of amici curiae filed.
2021-06-14
Brief of respondent S.B. in opposition filed.
2021-06-01
Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, Ducote, et al.
2021-05-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 21, 2021)
Attorneys
Ducote, et al.
Jane Bambauer, Richard W. Garnett, Nadine Strossen, and Eugene Volokh
S.B.
Elisabeth Pride — Pride Law LLC, Respondent
Women's and Children's Advocacy Project, et al.
Wendy J. Murphy — New Englland School of Law, Amicus