No. 20-1613
John Wayne Collins v. James David Green, Warden
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)
Tags: aedpa aedpa-deference clearly-established-law criminal-joinder federal-constitutional-claim federal-constitutional-rights habeas-corpus standard-of-review state-court-proceedings state-supreme-court unreasonable-application
Latest Conference:
2021-09-27
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Whether de novo review instead of deferential review under AEDPA applies where a state supreme court's analysis was not conducted deliberately as a federal constitutional claim?
2. Whether the court of appeals erred by holding that the joinder of two temporally, geographically, and evidentiarily distinct crimes is not contrary to the clearly established law of this Court as set forth in United States v. Lane, 474 U.S. 438, 446 n.8 (1986)?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether de novo review instead of deferential review under AEDPA applies where a state supreme court's analysis was not conducted deliberately as a federal constitutional claim?
Docket Entries
2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-07-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-07-28
Reply of petitioner John Wayne Collins filed. (Distributed)
2021-07-14
Brief of respondent James David Green, Warden in opposition filed.
2021-06-11
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including July 21, 2021.
2021-06-10
Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 1, 2021 to July 21, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-06-01
Response Requested. (Due July 1, 2021)
2021-05-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/10/2021.
2021-05-24
Waiver of right of respondent James David Green, Warden to respond filed.
2021-05-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 18, 2021)
Attorneys
James David Green, Warden
Kenneth W. Riggs — Office of the Solicitor General, Respondent
John Wayne Collins