No. 20-16
Edward Wayne Binns v. United States, et al.
Response Waived
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights collateral-estoppel due-process eeoc-complaint equitable-tolling extraordinary-circumstances res-judicata standing title-vii
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2020-09-29
Question Presented (from Petition)
WHETHER AN EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION COMPLAINT FILING, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WOULD BE TIMELY FILED FOR A TITLE 7 ACTION, UNDER THE HOLLAND -v- FLORIDA, 560 U. S. 631 (2010), U S SUPREME COURT EQUITABLE TOLLING PRINCIPLES WHEREAS IN THIS INSTANT PETITIONER'S CASE, EXTRAORDINARY CIRCUMSTANCES STOOD IN HIS WAY AND PREVENTED TIMELY FILING OF APPEAL FROM EEOC DECISION, AND OR ITS INCORRECT FILING UNDER 42 USC 1983 RESULTING IN RES JUDICATA AND COLLATERIAL ESTOPPEL RECOVERY BAR?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether an EEOC complaint filing would be timely for a Title 7 action under Holland-v-Florida equitable tolling principles
Docket Entries
2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-07-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-07-20
Waiver of right of respondent United States, et al. to respond filed.
2020-06-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 12, 2020)
Attorneys
Edward Wayne Binns
Edward Wayne Binns — Petitioner
United States, et al.
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent