No. 20-1578
Response Waived
Tags: 11th-amendment civil-rights criminal-acts due-process qualified-immunity respondeat-superior service-of-process sovereign-immunity state-official-immunity state-officials
Key Terms:
DueProcess Securities
DueProcess Securities
Latest Conference:
2021-06-10
Question Presented (from Petition)
It is long settled that a Complaint against State Officials is not a Complaint against the State, but that it is in-fact against the Officials, e.g., as settled by Ex Parte Young; or Pennhurst State Sch. v. Halderman, which cites Young in such a way as to add clarity to Young ; and more. Yes, this issue is settled...which is why I am simply asking for a Summary Reversal.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether state officials can be sued in their individual capacities for alleged criminal acts under Ex Parte Young
Docket Entries
2021-08-02
Rehearing DENIED.
2021-07-08
DISTRIBUTED.
2021-06-18
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2021-06-14
Petition DENIED.
2021-05-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/10/2021.
2021-05-21
Waiver of right of respondent State of Arizona to respond filed.
2021-04-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 14, 2021)
Attorneys
State of Arizona, et al.
Mark C. Dangerfield — Gallagher & Kennedy PA, Respondent
William A. Graven
William A. Graven — Petitioner