No. 20-1571

Andrew Raymond and Brian Requena v. United States

Lower Court: Second Circuit
Docketed: 2021-05-12
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: analogue-act analogue-enforcement-act controlled-substances criminal-procedure due-process jury-unanimity sixth-amendment vagueness-doctrine
Latest Conference: 2021-06-10
Question Presented (from Petition)

1. Whether the Controlled Substances Analogue Enforcement Act of 1986 is void for vagueness.

2. Whether the Controlled Substances Analogue Enforcement Act of 1986 requires jury unanimity as to whether a substance is controlled by the Act.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Controlled Substances Analogue Enforcement Act of 1986 is void for vagueness

Docket Entries

2021-06-14
Petition DENIED.
2021-05-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/10/2021.
2021-05-17
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2021-05-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 11, 2021)

Attorneys

Andrew Raymond, et al.
James Evan FelmanSuite 1450, Petitioner
United States of America
Elizabeth B. PrelogarActing Solicitor General, Respondent