1. Texas contravenes the Due Process Clause of the
U.S. Constitution on multi-count and contradicts
SCOTUS. SCOTUS has yet to answer all States
contradicting due process against Fourteenth
Amendment whether COA/Texas-courts
a. Prohibit all critical defense-witnesses waiting
to testify,
b. Prohibit recross to impeach the State-Perjurers
present-outside subject-to-recall,
c. Neglect perplexed Jury's actual law-questions
in-deliberations?

2. Texas prohibits all the Constitutional Rights of
innocent citizens, and contradicts SCOTUS &
Federal Laws against Sixth and Ninth
Amendments,
contravene the U.S. Constitution and Federal laws
to :a. Foster malicious-prosecution, but prohibit
Right of innocent citizens' own-summation, and
unreasonably off the record to deprive them,
b. Deny innocent citizen's Right-to-Represent
themselves,
c. Deny innocent citizens' Right-to-Testify under
oath,
d. Exempt Corrupt-enterprise-Perjurers to abet
white-collar-crimes depriving innocent citizens
of their civil rights?Whether COA/Texas-courts

3. Texas misinterprets and contravenes the Texas
Laws and contradicts SCOTUS & CCA. SCOTUS
has yet to answer whether an active-employee can
be involuntarily servitude and false-imprisoned at
his employment for a fake-trespass without cause
or warrant against the Thirteenth Amendment, § l,
and whether COA/Texas-courts with scienter :a. Oppress applicable Texas-laws from Jury
despite repeated lucid-objections during charge
formulation (What is employees' defense from
Trespass-charge at their own work?),
b. Breach Texas-laws to unlawfully deny innocent
citizen's rightful Directed-Verdict (Does "falling
Petitioner's weak body to the ground due to off-
duty-police's excessive use-of-force-assault-
injuries " call Resisting?),
c. Promote malicious fabricated/defective-
complaints despite innocent Citizen not even
committed a civil-offence,
d. Unlawfully deny Motion-to-Reopen during
guilt-innocence-phase,
e. Filibuster hearings on New-Trial Motions?

4. Texas contravenes the Rules of Evidence against
the U.S. & Texas Constitution and contradicts
Federal Laws. SCOTUS has yet to answer whether
unreasonable search and seizure at employment
without any warrant or cause using off-duty
State's force against the Fourth Amendment
applies to States, and whether COA/Texas-courts:a. Exclude critical-evidence after proper-
foundation & explicit-authentications,
b. Aid unlawful seizure, admit spoliation legal-
insufficient concealed-evidence and prohibit
disproof against it,
c. Propagandize irrelevant contextless hearsays,
d. Neglect Expert's demonstration on unlawful
use-of-force violating Texas rules regulations?

Whether COA/Texas-courts contravene the U.S. Constitution and Federal laws