No. 20-1549
Jeffrey B. Broadhurst v. Citimortgage, Inc.
Response Waived
Experienced Counsel
Tags: civil-procedure consumer-protection contract deposition-testimony due-process loan-modification standing summary-judgment third-circuit UTPCPL
Key Terms:
Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri Jurisdiction
Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri Jurisdiction
Latest Conference:
2021-09-27
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the Third Circuit Court of Appeals Erred in Affirming the District Court's Order Granting Respondent's Motion for Summary Judgment by finding that because Petitioner, in deposition, stated that he may not have accepted the loan modification terms, he was unable to show harm under the UTPCPL.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Third Circuit Court of Appeals Erred in Affirming the District Court's Order Granting Respondent's Motion for Summary Judgment
Docket Entries
2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-06-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-06-04
Waiver of right of respondent CitiMortgage, Inc. to respond filed.
2021-05-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 7, 2021)
Attorneys
CitiMortgage, Inc.
Martin C. Bryce Jr. — Ballard Spahr, LLP, Respondent
Jeffrey B. Broadhurst
Robert L. Sirianni Jr. — Brownstone, P.A., Petitioner