Joe Blessett v. Office of the Attorney General of Texas
SocialSecurity DueProcess FourthAmendment Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
1. Did U.S. Congress intend for Title IV-D Cooperative-Federalism 42 U.S.C 654(3) contactors escape private law liabilities for violating their 10th amendment protections under their contract with the U.S. government?
2. Did the Respondent forfeit its 11th amendment privilege by in failure to clearly make its intentions known upon a direct challenged by the Petitioner-Appellant ("Blessett") in the trial court in 2017 and failure to protect its 11th amendment privilege before a judicial determination on March 6, 2019, in the 5th Circuit Court by its legal conduct?
3. Does the Texas Title IV-D program violate the "Separation of Powers" with state employees acting as contracted federal agents for the program and Texas state actors cloaked in state sovereignty at the same time?
4. Is it an overreach of "Public Law into Private Law Domain" by Title IV-D of the Social Security Act?
5. Does the Title IV-D program provide any benefits to the noncustodial parent?
6. Who is the primary lender on the interstate contracts in question under federal law?
7. Blessett challenges U.S. Constitutionality of the 42 U.S.C.658a incentives for performance as monetary inducement to coerce the 42 U.S.C. 654(3) contractors to increase performance revenues like any income-generating business and criminalize noncustodial parents?
8. Does federal statute 42 U.S.C. 658a of the Title IV-D of Social Security Act of the program help create an implicit derogatory bias against child debtor with financial inducement to the state agencies?
9. Can Blessett be defaulted into a Title IV-D contract without due process, without knowledge of the contract, and receiving benefits from the contract?
10. Was Blessett entitled to a copy of a valid legal instrument under 42 U.S.C. 654(12) as proof of Title IV-D interstate contractual obligation as a public law protections for his civil rights as a private individual?
11. Does the Petitioner demand for monetary relief for his injuries caused by 10th amendment protections violations disturb the Respondent's 11th amendment protections under contract law?
12. Does the Petitioners Final Divorce Decree support order as an interstate contract enjoy commerce clause and contact clause protections under Title IV-D enforcement as an equitable instrument?
13. Can the individual Title IV-D agencies as income-generating agencies escape private law liabilities for noncompliance with the federal statutes of their federal program contract?
14. What Public Law prevents the use of the Clearfield Trust Law Doctrine against paid contracted U.S. Government contracted agencies for noncompliance with their contracts and infringement on Blessett's private contracts?
15. Was Joe Blessett entitled to 'Commerce Clause" protections, and "Contract Clause" protections to prevent the injuries caused by the Title IV-D agency?
16. Can the Title IV-D agency be in of noncompliance with Title IV-D of the Social Security Act and still preserve Federal Statutes, the U.S. Constitution, and 10th amendment protection from suit?
17. Did U.S. Congress intend for Texas Office of Attorney General Title IV-D child support agency violate the "Separation of Powers" by acting as contracted federal agents cloaked in state sovereign authority?
18. Did U.S. Congress
Did U.S. Congress intend for Title IV-D 42 U.S.C 654(3) contractors escape private law liabilities for violating their 10th amendment protections under their contract with the U.S. government?