Does the fact that there is "no defense for Federal Mitigation wrongdoing by lenders in non-judicial State court " while such defense naturally exists in federal court, violate the Equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment?

2. Does the fact that there is "no defense for Federal Mitigation wrongdoing bv lenders in non-judicial State court " while such defense naturally exists in federal court, violate the Federal "Supremacy Clause " in the Second paragraph of Article VI of the US Constitution?

3. Since a lender can stretch its RESPA abuse such as Dual-Tracking over many months or years to use up the victim 's three-year Statute of Limitation Period, in this case 19 months of dual-Tracking followed by a nonjudicial state court procedure stretched for 2 years, should Equitable Tolling of the Statute of Limitation be applied in RESPA (Real Estate Settlement Procedure Act) cases?

4. Does issuing a State Writ of Possession, before the Federal Mitigation wrong doings are addressed in a proper jurisdiction, violate the Federal "Supremacy Clause " in the Second paragraph of Article VI of the US Constitution?

Whether the lack of a defense for federal mitigation wrongdoing by lenders in non-judicial state courts violates the Equal Protection Clause and Supremacy Clause