1. Whether the stated claims for relief of this Case arising directly under the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution can be circumvented by unconstitutional departures from established law and procedures?

A. Whether or not the State of Georgia has abridged Timbes ' privileges or immunities by making and/or enforcing the Discretionary Appeal Process under O.C.G.A. § 5-6-35, which has allowed arbitrary denial of appeal without reason?

B. Whether Timbes ' having been deprived of her property without due process of law, and having been denied equal protection of the laws, is a violation the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, Section 1?

2. Whether alleging creditors with no proven ownership in the subject property have Article III standing to have brought a dispossessory action and/or to have moved for Summary Judgment and/or to have moved to dismiss Timbes ' Counterclaim, which lawsuit challenges a state-regulated, non-judicial foreclosure as void for violation of Georgia law requiring that a valid assignment be filed prior to foreclosure, and/or for mortgage fraud under the Georgia RICO Act, and/or for violation of the Trust 's PSA?

Whether the stated claims for relief of this Case arising directly under the due-process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution can be circumvented by unconstitutional departures from established law and procedures