Alan W. Crittenden v. Mariko C. Crittenden
For purposes of the disposition of Petitioner's constitutional rights (including those with respect to custody of and visitation with his minor children), did the State of Georgia deny Petitioner equal protection and/or due process of law by dismissing his complaint for divorce for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, where there was no other forum in which Petitioner could seek a divorce?
Does Congress' Military and Treaty Powers under the Supremacy Clause, both of which authorize the applicable Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA) between the nation of Japan and the United States govern and control, and therefore supersede, the decision of the state of Georgia to deprive Petitioner of a forum to adjudicate his constitutional rights and those of his minor children?
Did the State of Georgia deny Petitioner equal-protection, due-process by dismissing his divorce complaint for lack of subject-matter-jurisdiction, where there was no other forum?