No. 20-147

Timothy B. Brown v. U.S. Bank National Association, et al.

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2020-08-13
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Tags: adversary-process civil-procedure district-court due-process magistrate magistrate-referral pro-se-litigant res-judicata sua-sponte
Latest Conference: 2020-10-16
Question Presented (from Petition)

Does the Supreme Court's Ruling in Arizona v. California, 530 U.S. 392 (2000) empower a District Judge to Raise the issue of res judicata sua sponte in a case where the District Judge refers the Case to a Magistrate to determine if res judicata applies to the case?

If the Supreme Court answers yes to the above question, then Does the Raising of the Issue of res judicate Violate a Pro Se Litigant's Due Process Rights and does such action undermine the Adversary Process of our Legal System?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does the Supreme Court's ruling in Arizona v. California empower a District Judge to raise the issue of res judicata sua sponte?

Docket Entries

2020-10-19
Petition DENIED.
2020-09-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/16/2020.
2020-08-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 14, 2020)

Attorneys

Timothy B. Brown
Timothy B. Brown — Petitioner