No. 20-1460
Rolando Cruz, Jr. v. United States
Response Waived
Tags: appellate-review conspiracy criminal-procedure evidence evidence-standard indictment indictment-variance rico-conspiracy third-circuit united-states-v-rowe
Latest Conference:
2021-05-13
Question Presented (from Petition)
I.
WHETHER IT WAS ERROR FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT TO
JUSTIFY AFFIRMANCE OF THE RICO CONSPIRACY
CONVICTIONS ON THE BASIS OF EVIDENCE PROVING
SOMETHING QUITE DIFFERENT FROM WHAT WAS
CHARGED IN THE INDICTMENT?
II.
WHETHER UNITED STATES V. ROWE APPLIES TO
CONSPIRACY CASES?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Third Circuit erred in affirming RICO conspiracy convictions based on evidence of a different conspiracy than was charged
Docket Entries
2021-04-29
Stipulation to dismissal under Rule 46 filed.
2021-04-29
Petition Dismissed - Rule 46.
2021-04-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/13/2021.
2021-04-21
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-04-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 17, 2021)
Attorneys
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent