Tracy Nixon v. General Motors Corporation
I. Whether The U.S. District Court Swolge Commit Ay Ercoe IN Decision adopting the U.S. Magistrate Sudees ocdec signed on June i, HORO Petitioner Subontr Aependil AS Enidence And Aske whether Appendix(A) Ketied on as... Ev den Ce yihad The Respondent Profecly=. , SecNed Accocding "to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 4@Ch),fece HOW...
II. Whethec Respondent SMC fey sees 4S a €acreian CorpararlOn tex, OM Proo Ty eat Maine mR Redlstered Koen Enkitle Gekitiorec 40 Deafautr Suddinent:
III. Whethec Ine Metrod. | . , Respondent Recorain "2 Appendix (A) was Fe ACCOrdaNc UHR SeNiCe ON A NON — besident toy the "Tex0S: CN PCAC, and Kem, Code \TOdd!, @sexaS Business COMPOTION ACT $10 re
IV. Ur UShe-knec The APPENDIX(AD ALLOW The Fede Cou cee Oke Poesanal Tucisaictign > al ec KS ee .
V. oNS hethee PAeteC Ple cs Entey ot Dekou Ht Sudgnet Was the Court ReCusal To ssc Detoult STdamenr A Prejudice 0 Pet tiorne¢ 63
Whether the U.S. District Court erred in its decision adopting the Magistrate Judge's order