No. 20-1399
Andrew J. Capul, et al. v. City of New York, New York, et al.
Tags: coerced-resignation due-process employment-termination loudermill municipal-employment pre-deprivation-process pre-deprivation-rights property-interest property-rights
Latest Conference:
2021-06-03
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether a municipal employer's coerced resignation of an employee with a protected property interest in continued employment requires pre-deprivation due process under Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill, 470 U.S. 532 (1985).
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a municipal employer's coerced resignation of an employee with a protected property interest in continued employment requires pre-deprivation due process under Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill, 470 U.S. 532 (1985)
Docket Entries
2021-06-07
Petition DENIED.
2021-05-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/3/2021.
2021-04-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 6, 2021)
Attorneys
Andrew J. Capul, et al.
Matthew Brian Weinick — Famighetti & Weinick, PLLC, Petitioner