Is not specifically naming non-dispositive factors, when actually arguing the factors, a waiver of claims?

When an IDEA-eligible child with a disability is inappropriately disqualified from special education, has a legally cognizable injury occurred?

When a child with a disability has not received the appropriate special education services in an identified area of need, is a parent required to show regression or de minimis progress to be entitled to substantive relief?

What is the appropriate standard of review concerning questions of whether a student made appropriate progress under the IDEA?

Is not specifically naming non-dispositive factors, when actually arguing the factors, a waiver of claims?