1) Has the 'peoples' right to 'personal liberty'
been suspended? Whereas the State; through statutes;
is criminalizing 'personal liberty ' while authorizing its
agencies arid agents to seize private
property(automobiles) without warrants; taking
without compensation; then the transfer of such
property to a private entity, as well as authorizing
that private entity the right to demand compensation
for the return of said property.

2) Does a statute which operates without mens
rea, that criminalizes a contractual obligation, deny
Due Process of Law and is this statute overly broad
and vague on it's face and as applied?

3) Do the rulings/actions of judges and justices;
in this case; deny Due Process of Law, violate their
oaths of office to support the Constitution as well as
constitute an 'Unfair Trial'? Whereas the trial judge
has; declared that definitions in a dictionary are not
relevant in the State of Maine; denied questioning a
witness on his/her knowledge of the Constitution; as
well as denied submission of relevant evidence and
law to the jury.

Has the 'peoples' right to 'personal liberty' been suspended?