1) Seven (7) government agencies failed in applying Title VII
mandates as outlined in our United States Constitution; Was
this a coordinated effort by government employees to
undermine the Rule of Law for the purpose of attacking and/or
diminishing our Democracy.

2) Did the United States Federal Court for the Eastern District
violate Plaintiff/Petitioner 's Constitutional Due Process
rights by assigning and unassigning this Pro-Se litigant 's
case, in a deliberate effort to suppress evidence resulting in
irreparable harm to this aggrieving Plaintiff?

3) Did AFSCME Employee Union as co-defendants in this case,
violate Plaintiffs Constitutional rights of equal protection
under law by a) failing to represent this Employee Steward
with a licensed attorney, and b) remaining complicit for the
purpose of maintaining their government contract with said
Defendants?

4) Did the California Personnel Board breech Title VII
requirements by ruling that an Employment Contract begins
prior to an employee and employer ever demonstrates a
meeting of the minds? Were their actions an attack on the rule
of law, both in substance and in fact, that violates the basic
tenants of Contract law?

5) Did Federal EEOC Analysts fail to issue a Subpoena to
Defendants, to discover if the Employer engaged in
Retaliation against this Plaintiff/Petitioner when the
Employer received a Cease-and-Desist Order?

6) Did the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
fail to provide this Plaintiff/Petitioner with equal protections
under law, by sanctioning the lower court 's ruling against this

7) Pro-Se Litigant without applying due diligence and absent the
investigation of genuine evidence?

8) Did Defendants, a government employer, engage in a
"pattern " of racial discrimination against this
Plaintiff/Petitioner for the purpose of preventing this African
American Psychologist from becoming licensed in the State of
California?

Was this a coordinated effort by government employees to undermine the Rule of Law?