1. Whether the State Appellate Court's order that invalidates and defies the "act of state" of the Philippines (act of state of the Philippines allowing its own Filipino citizens entry to his homeland with expired passport) is a violation of the "act of state doctrine" and the separation of powers provision as consistently ruled and upheld by the US Supreme Court?

2. Whether the US Supreme Court's consistent rulings and guidance (on the act of state doctrine, separation of powers) still holds true, or can the State and Federal Courts now, after a century of consistent US Supreme Court rulings and guidance from the case of Underhill to Kirkpatrick, be allowed to mandate how "foreign relations" should be conducted?

3. Whether the US Supreme Court's holding in American Airlines v. Wolens that under Federal Law an Airlines' own Statute of Limitations (incorporated by reference in an Airlines' own ticket for any actions against the same Airline) is "Enforceable", still holds true?

4. Whether the State Appellate Court's refusal to "Enforce" Japan Airlines' own two (2) yr Statute of Limitations (incorporated by reference in Japan Airlines' own ticket for all actions against Japan Airlines), is a clear defiance of the Federal Law, US Constitution (Federal Preemption), and this Court's precedent in the case of American Airlines v. Wolens?

Whether the State Appellate Court's order invalidating the 'act of state' of the Philippines violates the act-of-state-doctrine and separation-of-powers