1. Is the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment violated where a judge persisted in non-disclosure and presided over the final 2019 hearing — after being presented in court with an oral motion to recuse based upon newly discovered, indisputable evidence that he independently investigated material facts and suborned false testimony, in collusion with his undisclosed life-long close friend in an earlier 2015 Rule 11 hearing, in which he initiated and presided over to suppress the truth of Petitioner's 2015 recusal allegations and impose a pre-filing requirement that intentionally impeded and block Petitioner's 1st and 14th Amendment rights to petition and participate in the six year proceeding as natural daughter and successor beneficiary of her mother's guardianship and conservatorship estate, and again suborned the same false testimony as adverse witness in an attorney disciplinary proceedings in 2018 to have her disbarred —to ultimately rush the approval of his undisclosed friend's accounting, block Petitioner's personal liability claims against the misappropriation of over $20 million in estate assets, transfer the remaining estate to the other conservator, as the ex parte appointed personal representative of Anne Marie's intestate estate in disregard of her properly executed written Last Will & Testament, and finally to serve upon Petitioner a new 2019 ex parte Rule 11 order, without notice or opportunity, that blocks Petitioner's participation in the probate of her mother's estate before another sitting judge.

Is the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment violated