No. 20-131
Essity Hygiene and Health AB v. Cascades Canada ULC, et al.
Tags: appointments-clause constitutional-interpretation discretion federal-circuit forfeiture judicial-discretion pending-cases precedential-decision scalia
Latest Conference:
2020-10-09
Question Presented (from Petition)
Following a precedential decision sustaining an Appointments Clause challenge, does a court have discretion to apply the decision in pending cases where it has not already been raised, and if so, under what circumstances should it exercise that discretion?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether courts have discretion to apply a precedential Appointments Clause decision in pending cases where the issue was not raised in the opening appellate brief, and if so, under what circumstances
Docket Entries
2020-10-13
Petition DENIED.
2020-09-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/9/2020.
2020-07-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 8, 2020)
Attorneys
Essity Hygiene and Health AB, et al.
Martin J. Black — Dechert LLP, Petitioner