No. 20-1303
Anthony Pappas v. Joseph Lorintz, et al.
Response Waived
Tags: campaign-funds civil-procedure civil-rights due-process federal-election judicial-review private-right-of-action standing state-actor third-party-interference
Latest Conference:
2021-05-13
Question Presented (from Petition)
1) Did the Second Circuit Court of Appeals commit serious error when it affirmed dismissal of a civil rights action challenging state actor interferences in a federal election, one that featured divorce executions upon a congressional campaign account?
2) Alternatively, did this extraordinary case seeking timely relief unavailable before the Federal Election Commission warrant a private right of action in federal court to remedy unlawful third-party conversions of federal campaign funds administered by Petitioner?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the Second Circuit Court of Appeals commit serious error when it affirmed dismissal of a civil rights action challenging state actor interferences in a federal election?
Docket Entries
2021-05-17
Petition DENIED.
2021-04-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/13/2021.
2021-04-12
Waiver of right of respondents Joseph Lorintz and State of New York to respond filed.
2021-03-22
Waiver of right of respondent TD Bank, N.A. to respond filed.
2021-03-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 19, 2021)
Attorneys
Anthony Pappas
Anthony Pappas — Petitioner
Joseph Lorintz and State of New York
Barbara Dale Underwood — Solicitor General, Respondent
TD Bank, N.A.
Matthew Allen Fitzgerald — McGuireWoods LLP, Respondent