No. 20-1298
Demetreus A. Keahey v. Dave Marquis, Warden
Tags: 14th-amendment 6th-amendment clearly established federal law regarding a defen criminal-procedure jury-trial or is an unreasonable application of self-defense due-process fourteenth-amendment habeas-corpus jury-trial self-defense sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
DueProcess SecondAmendment HabeasCorpus
DueProcess SecondAmendment HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2021-09-27
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the failure to give a self-defense jury instruction contradicts, or is an unreasonable application of, clearly established federal law regarding a defendant's due process and jury trial rights when self-defense was the crux of the defendant's case and the defendant introduced evidence to support the defense?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the failure to give a self-defense jury instruction contradicts
Docket Entries
2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-06-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-06-29
Reply of petitioner Demetreus Keahey filed. (Distributed)
2021-06-10
Brief of respondent Dave Marquis in opposition filed.
2021-04-16
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including June 11, 2021.
2021-04-15
Motion to extend the time to file a response from May 12, 2021 to June 11, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-04-12
Response Requested. (Due May 12, 2021)
2021-04-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/23/2021.
2021-04-06
Waiver of right of respondent Dave Marquis to respond filed.
2021-03-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 19, 2021)
Attorneys
Dave Marquis
Michael Jason Hendershot — Ohio Attorney General's Office, Respondent
Demetreus Keahey
Autumn Hamit Patterson — Jones Day, Petitioner