1. IS THE OPINION REND ERED BY THE THIRD DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA IN ALF J. AANOSEN, APPELLANT v MICHAEL A. SUAREZ ETC. APPELLEE , (CASE NOS. 3D18 -2466, 3D19 -0612 ), IN CON FLICT WITH THE INTENT AND PURPOSE OF THE FOREIGN CORRUPT PRACTICES ACT , 15 US.C. § 78dd -1 et seq. ( "THE FOREIGN CORRUPT PRACTICES ACT" ), AND WITH THE SUPREMACY CLAUSE OF THE U.S. CONSTITUTION, ARTICLE VI, PARAGRAPH 2, OF THE U.S. CONSTITUTION?

2. IS THE OPINION RENDRED BY THE THIRD DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA IN ALF J. AANOSEN, APPELLANT v MICHAEL A. SUAREZ ETC. APPELLEE, (CASE NOS. 3D18 -2466, 3D19 -0612 ) IN CONFLICT AND DIRECT CONTRAVENTION WITH OTHER APPELLATE DISTRICT COURT DECISIONS, BOT H AT THE STATE AND FEDERAL LEVEL REGARDING THE SAME ISSUE OF LAW?

3. HAS A STATE COURT, NAMELY THE THIRD DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, DECIDED AN IMPORTANT FEDERAL QUESTION IN A WAY THAT CONFLICTS WITH RELEVANT DECISIONS OF THIS COURT?

4. DOES THE PROPER INTERPRETATION OF THE FCPA BUSINESS NEXUS REQUIREMENTS PRESENTS AN ISSUE OF NATIONAL IMPORTANCE?

Is the opinion rendered by the Third District Court of Appeal of Florida in conflict with the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the Supremacy Clause?