No. 20-125
Iron Stone Real Estate Fund I, L.P., et al. v. Stephen Ratner, et al.
Tags: civil-procedure direct-action due-process judicial-dissolution limited-partner limited-partnership partnership-law party-rights procedural-due-process standing
Latest Conference:
2020-10-09
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the procedural due process rights of a limited partner are violated when that limited partner is not named as a party in a direct action brought by another limited partner in which judicial dissolution of the limited partnership is sought and subsequently ordered.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the procedural due process rights of a limited partner are violated when that limited partner is not named as a party in a direct action
Docket Entries
2020-10-13
Petition DENIED.
2020-09-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/9/2020.
2020-09-01
Brief of respondents Stephen Ratner, et al. in opposition filed.
2020-07-31
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 4, 2020)
Attorneys
Iron Stone Real Estate Fund I, L.P., et al.
Brett Adam Berman — Fox Rothschild LLP, Petitioner
Stephen Ratner, et al.
Phillip David Berger — Berger Law Group, P.C., Respondent