No. 20-1222
Julie Dalessio v. University of Washington, et al.
Response Waived
Tags: 42-usc-1983 ada americans-with-disabilities-act civil-rights comprehensive-remedial-scheme due-process judicial-review ninth-circuit remedial-scheme section-1983 statutory-interpretation statutory-rights
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity DueProcess Privacy HealthPrivacy
SocialSecurity DueProcess Privacy HealthPrivacy
Latest Conference:
2021-04-01
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Does a "comprehensive remedial scheme for the enforcement of a statutory right " under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) [42 U.S.C. 12101 et seq.] foreclose resort to a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim to vindicate the right?
2. Did the Ninth circuit court of appeals so far depart from the accepted and usual course of judicial proceedings, or sanctioned such a departure by the district court, as to call for an exercise of this Court 's supervisory power?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does a comprehensive remedial scheme for the enforcement of a statutory right under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) foreclose resort to a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim to vindicate the right?
Docket Entries
2021-04-05
Petition DENIED.
2021-03-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/1/2021.
2021-03-12
Waiver of right of respondents University of Washington, et al. to respond filed.
2021-02-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 2, 2021)
Attorneys
Julie Dalessio
Julie Dalessio — Petitioner
University of Washington, et al.
Jayne L. Freeman — Keating, Bucklin & McCormack, Respondent