No. 20-1209

In Re Raymond L. Rogers

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2021-03-02
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: all-writs-act appeals appellate-jurisdiction circuit-court criminal-procedure due-process jurisdiction jurisdictional-challenge sentencing statutory-authority statutory-interpretation
Latest Conference: 2021-03-26
Question Presented (from Petition)

Your Petitioner is [requesting] and [praying] for this United States Supreme Court to exercise its supervisory appellate powers pursuant-to 28 U.S.C. § 1651(3) under the "All Writs Act", to [command] Judge Bobby R. Baldock (hereinafter "Judge Baldock") a Circuit Court Judge sitting on the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals three judges appellate panel whom ruled on your Petitioner criminal direct appeals proceedings, to [vacate] the court's April 5, 2013, Order and Judgment, being challenged by way of this extraordinary remedy attached hereto as Exhibits "A", and to retain jurisdiction of your Petitioner's criminal direct appeals proceedings pursuant-to 28 U.S.C § 1291, and proceed to [first] properly ask and answer the Articial III jurisdictional question concerning the Kansas District Court's statutory criminal authority to prosecute and punish your Petitioner for the crimes he was found guilty in the Kansas District Court for violating and which he now sits punished in a Federal Prison for.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals erred in failing to vacate the Kansas District Court's criminal conviction and sentence of the petitioner

Docket Entries

2021-03-29
Petition DENIED.
2021-03-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/26/2021.
2021-03-04
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-07-30
Petition for a writ of mandamus and/or prohibition filed. (Response due April 1, 2021)

Attorneys

Raymond L. Rogers
Raymond L. Rogers — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarActing Solicitor General, Respondent