No. 20-1188

Marilynn Thomason v. Beneficial Financial I Inc.

Lower Court: Idaho
Docketed: 2021-02-25
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: 18-usc-1956 28-usc-1651 appellate-procedure constitutional-authority court-records due-process equal-protection idaho-appellate-rule-28 judicial-discretion
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess FourthAmendment
Latest Conference: 2021-04-30
Question Presented (from Petition)

Whether any State Supreme Court, state appellate court, state district court and/or any clerk of such court has the constitutional and statutory authority to arbitrarily deny a party their legal rights to a full and complete disclosure of timely requested and paid for court records pertinent to an appeal that directly and deliberately prevents and denies a party from being able to complete its briefings and denying a party the ability to submit a brief with the required citations to lower court filing indexes?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether any State Supreme Court, state appellate court, state district court and/or any clerk of such court has the constitutional and statutory authority to arbitrarily deny a party their legal rights to a full and complete disclosure of timely requested and paid for court records pertinent to an appeal that directly and deliberately prevents and denies a party from being able to complete its briefings and denying a party the ability to submit a brief with the required citations to lower court filing indexes?

Docket Entries

2021-05-03
Petition DENIED.
2021-04-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/30/2021.
2021-03-12
Waiver of right of respondents Forsberg Law Office, Ltd. & Abundent Land Holdings, Inc. to respond filed.
2020-12-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 29, 2021)

Attorneys

Forsberg Law Office, Ltd. & Abundent Land Holdings, Inc.
William ForsbergForsberg & Evans Law, Respondent
Marilynn Thomason
Marilynn Thomason — Petitioner