"Did the lower court of appeal have broad discretion to not address the alleged bias and summarily deny the writ of mandate during the current pandemic of COVID-19, moreover does a court have to consider a petitioner's health status or if they would have a higher rate of mortality if infected with COVID-19, prior to denying relief that could significantly lessen their chances of being exposed to the virus?"

Whether a court has to consider a petitioner's health status or if they would have a higher rate of mortality if infected with COVID-19, prior to denying relief that could significantly lessen their chances of being exposed to the virus?

Furthermore, is new law under uniformity needed for a court to rule on a pre-existing medical condition that increases a litigant's chances of dying from COVID-19 as reason for the relief they are seeking?

Whether a court has to consider a petitioner's health status or if they would have a higher rate of mortality if infected with COVID-19, prior to denying relief that could significantly lessen their chances of being exposed to the virus?