No. 20-114
Michael Edward Bufkin v. Scottrade, Inc., et al.
Tags: administrative-law arbitration-dispute civil-procedure compelled-arbitration due-process finra foia-request judicial-procedure standing statutory-interpretation tax tax-controversy
Key Terms:
Arbitration Securities Privacy
Arbitration Securities Privacy
Latest Conference:
2020-10-09
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Was it error to compel FINRA arbitration of this "tax" dispute?
2. Was it error to refer anything to the un-consented-to magistrate?
3. Was it abuse to deny Bufkin his Discovery?
4. Was it abuse to find Rule 4 insufficiencies?
5. Was it abuse to dismiss the IRS-related parties?
6. Was it an error to instruct the Clerk to enter a "Judgment"?
7. Was it error for the Clerk to sign a "Judgment"?
8. Did USCA11 abuse discretion by sanctioning Bufkin?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Was it error to compel FINRA arbitration of this tax dispute?
Docket Entries
2020-10-13
Petition DENIED.
2020-09-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/9/2020.
2020-07-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 3, 2020)
Attorneys
Michael Bufkin
Michael Edward Bufkin — Petitioner