No. 20-1130
Ericsson Inc., et al. v. TCL Communication Technology Holdings Limited, et al.
Relisted (3)
Experienced Counsel
Tags: appellate-review civil-procedure discretion federal-civil-procedure judgment-as-a-matter-of-law judgment-as-matter-of-law legal-issues preservation-of-issues summary-judgment
Key Terms:
Patent JusticiabilityDoctri
Patent JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2021-05-13
(distributed 3 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Whether, notwithstanding the ordinary rule that a pretrial denial of a motion for summary judgment is not reviewable on appeal, there is an exception for summary-judgment decisions that turn solely on "legal issues."
2. Whether an order denying summary judgment can be reviewed following trial, at the discretion of the court of appeals, notwithstanding a party's failure to seek judgment as a matter of law on those grounds under Rule 50.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether there is an exception to the rule that a pretrial denial of summary judgment is not reviewable on appeal
Docket Entries
2021-05-17
Petition DENIED.
2021-05-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/13/2021.
2021-04-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/30/2021.
2021-04-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/23/2021.
2021-04-06
Reply of petitioners Ericsson Inc., et al. filed. (Distributed)
2021-03-29
Motion to delay distribution of the petition for a writ certiorari until April 7, 2021 granted.
2021-03-26
Motion of petitioner to delay distribution of the petition for a writ of certiorari under Rule 15.5 from March 31, 2021 to April 7, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-03-17
Brief of respondents TCL Communication Technology Holdings, Limited, et al. in opposition filed.
2021-02-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 19, 2021)
Attorneys
Ericsson Inc., et al.
Jeffrey Alan Lamken — MoloLamken LLP, Petitioner
TCL Communication Technology Holdings, Limited, et al.