No. 20-113
Jerald Hammann v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Response Waived
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-law constitutional-rights deemed-dismissal due-process judicial-procedure judicial-review procedural-error standing void-judgment writ-of-prohibition
Latest Conference:
2020-09-29
Question Presented (from Petition)
The first question presented is whether existing judicial procedures and standards are adequate to protect individual constitutional rights.
The second question presented is whether the court erred in declining to grant a writ of prohibition.
The third question presented is whether the court erred in declining to find the underlying orders and judgment void.
The fourth question presented is whether the court erred in its determinations relating to the deemed dismissal rule.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether existing judicial procedures and standards are adequate to protect individual constitutional rights
Docket Entries
2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-08-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-08-07
Waiver of right of respondent Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. to respond filed.
2020-07-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 2, 2020)
Attorneys
Jerald Hammann
Jerald A. Hammann — Petitioner
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Kristina H. Kaluza — Dykema Gossett, PLLC, Respondent