1. Whether the lower Court has misapplied Minne
sota State Bd. for Community Colls, v. Knight, 465
U.S. 271 (1984) in ruling Respondent Town Board
was not obligated to respond to Petitioner 's First
Amendment Petition for Redress of its knowingly
false entries in a written instrument constituting
a record of its public office.

2. Whether the lower Court has overlooked Garcetti
v. Ceballos, 457 U.S. 410 (2006) and Borough of
Duryea u. Guarnieri, 564 U.S. 379 (2011) in ruling
the Town Board was not obligated to respond to
said Petition for Redress.

3. Whether the lower Court has overlooked the His
torical Record of the Petition Clause in ruling the
Town Board was not obligated to respond to said
Petition for Redress.

4. Whether Petitioner 's Right to a "Republican Form
of Government, " guaranteed by Article IV, Section
4 of the Constitution for the United States, was
infringed when Respondent Town Board made
knowingly false entries in a written instrument
constituting a record of its public office, and re
fused to respond to Petitioner 's First Amendment
Petition for Redress of the violations.

5. Whether a State statute can deprive a citizen of
the United States of the protections afforded by
the Guarantee and Petition Clauses.

Whether the lower Court has misapplied Minnesota State Bd. for Community Colls. v. Knight, 465 US. 271 (1984)