Is the causal connection required for standing satisfied when it is substantially likely that a third party in the chain of causation will respond to the defendant's conduct in a way that injures the plaintiff, as held by the D.C., Second, Third, Eighth, Ninth, Tenth, and Eleventh Circuits, or does the participation of a third party with the ability to act independently almost automatically break the chain of causation, as held by the First, Fourth, and Sixth Circuits?

Does the causal connection required for standing exist when it is substantially likely that a third party will respond to the defendant's conduct in a way that injures the plaintiff?