No. 20-103
Stephen E. Stockman v. United States
Tags: bipartisan-campaign-reform-act buckley-standard buckley-v-valeo campaign-finance electioneering-communications feca-enforcement federal-election-campaign-act first-amendment fraud-claims mcconnell-v-fec
Latest Conference:
2020-09-29
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Whether Buckley's narrowing construction applies to non-BCRA activity (i.e., non-electioneering communications) in FECA enforcement actions.
2. Whether the government's fraud claims meet the exacting First Amendment standards in Madigan.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Buckley's narrowing construction applies to non-BCRA activity (i.e., non-electioneering communications) in FECA enforcement actions
Docket Entries
2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-09-02
Brief amicus curiae of Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence filed. (Distributed)
2020-09-02
Brief amici curiae of Public Advocate of the United States, et al. filed. (Distributed)
2020-09-02
Brief amicus curiae of Eagle Forum Education and Legal Defense Fund filed.
2020-08-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-08-12
Brief amici curiae of American Target Advertising, Inc., et al. filed. (Distributed)
2020-08-05
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-07-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 2, 2020)
Attorneys
American Target Advertising, Inc., et al.
Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence
Eagle Forum Education and Legal Defense Fund
John Michael Reeves Jr. — Reeves Law, LLC, Amicus
Public Advocate of the United States, et al.
Joseph W. Miller — Law Offices of Joseph Miller, Amicus
Stephen Stockman
Lawrence J. Joseph — Law Office of Lawrence J. Joseph, Petitioner
United States
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent