Congress has the sole power to govern the federal courts' original and review jurisdiction of state-court judgments. Does Rooker's usurpation of Congress' power to expand this Court's jurisdiction to include exclusive jurisdiction for appellate review of state-court judgments, and to contract the federal inferior courts' jurisdiction to exclude all original and review jurisdiction of state-court judgments, violate the Separation of Powers doctrine and Kokkonenv.P.1.

2. Has the combined effect of the federal inferior courts' various local rules resulted in the courts' ability to eliminate a litigant's right to be heard in violation of the 5th Amend.'s Due Process Clause, 7th Amend.'s Right of Trial by Jury, and Goldberg?

Whether Rooker's usurpation of Congress' power to expand this Court's jurisdiction to include exclusive jurisdiction for appellate review of state-court judgments, and to contract the federal inferior courts' jurisdiction to exclude all original and review jurisdiction of state-court judgments, violates the Separation of Powers doctrine and Kokkonen