No. 20-1012
Charles Guenther v. Lockheed Martin Corporation, et al.
Tags: breach-of-duty concealment discovery-rule erisa fiduciary-duty fraud fraud-exception statute-of-limitations uniformity-of-decision
Key Terms:
Arbitration ERISA
Arbitration ERISA
Latest Conference:
2021-04-30
Question Presented (from Petition)
Is the fraud and concealment exception in 29 U.S.C. § 1113 applicable when the underlying breach of fiduciary duty consists of fraud or concealment, or does there have to be additional fraud or concealment after the underlying breach of fiduciary duty to trigger the longer six year statute of limitations?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the fraud and concealment exception in 29 U.S.C. § 1113 applies when the underlying breach of fiduciary duty consists of fraud or concealment, or if there must be additional fraud or concealment after the underlying breach to trigger the longer six-year statute of limitations
Docket Entries
2021-05-03
Petition DENIED.
2021-04-23
Reply of petitioner Charles Guenther filed. (Distributed)
2021-04-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/30/2021.
2021-03-29
Brief of respondents Lockheed Martin Corporation, et al. in opposition filed.
2021-02-26
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including March 29, 2021.
2021-02-25
Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 26, 2021 to March 29, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-01-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 26, 2021)
Attorneys
Charles Guenther
Andrew Field Pierce — Pierce & Shearer LLP, Petitioner
Lockheed Martin Corporation, et al.
Nicole A. Saharsky — Mayer Brown LLP, Respondent