No. 20-101
Tags: actual-prejudice balancing-test constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process fair-trial preindictment-delay prejudice-analysis prosecutorial-misconduct prosecutorial-motive
Latest Conference:
2021-05-13
(distributed 14 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Where preindictment delay has caused actual prejudice to the accused's ability to defend himself, does the Due Process Clause require (1) the defendant to prove that the delay was driven by an improper prosecutorial motive; or (2) that courts balance the particular prejudice to the defendant against the particular reasons (or lack thereof) for the delay?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Where preindictment delay has caused actual prejudice to the accused's ability to defend himself, does the Due Process Clause require (1) the defendant to prove that the delay was driven by an improper prosecutorial motive; or (2) that courts balance the particular prejudice to the defendant against the particular reasons (or lack thereof) for the delay?
Docket Entries
2021-05-17
Petition DENIED.
2021-05-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/13/2021.
2021-04-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/30/2021.
2021-04-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/23/2021.
2021-04-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/16/2021.
2021-03-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/1/2021.
2021-03-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/26/2021.
2021-03-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/19/2021.
2021-03-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/5/2021.
2021-02-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/26/2021.
2021-02-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/19/2021.
2021-01-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/22/2021.
2021-01-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/15/2021.
2020-12-23
Reply of petitioner Lloyd Harris filed. (Distributed)
2020-12-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021.
2020-12-04
Brief of respondent State of Maryland in opposition filed.
2020-10-05
Brief amici curiae of Maine, Vermont, and Washington Associations of Criminal Defense Lawyers filed.
2020-09-09
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 4, 2020.
2020-09-03
Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 5, 2020 to December 4, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-09-03
Response Requested. (Due October 5, 2020)
2020-08-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-08-13
Waiver of right of respondent State of Maryland to respond filed.
2020-07-27
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 2, 2020)
Attorneys
Lloyd Harris
Amir H. Ali — Roderick & Solange MacArthur Justice Center, Petitioner
Maine, Vermont, and Washington Associations of Criminal Defense Lawyers
State of Maryland
Carrie J. Williams — Respondent