No. 20-100
Michael S. Barth v. Bernards Township Planning Board, et al.
Response WaivedRelisted (2)
Tags: constitutional-process constitutional-rights due-process equal-protection injunction new-jersey-supreme-court procedural-fairness remand supreme-court-review temporary-injunction
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2020-12-11
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
While there are a number of questions and sub questions in this matter, the overarching question is whether the unconstitutional process of the court below should result in a temporary injunction and or remand back to the New Jersey Supreme Court to ensure United States Constitutional Due Process and Equal Protection is followed?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the unconstitutional process of the court below should result in a temporary injunction and or remand back to the New Jersey Supreme Court to ensure United States Constitutional Due Process and Equal Protection is followed?
Docket Entries
2020-12-14
Rehearing DENIED. Justice Alito took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2020-11-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/11/2020.
2020-10-30
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2020-10-13
Petition DENIED. Justice Alito took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2020-09-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/9/2020.
2020-08-24
Waiver of right of respondents Bernards Township Planning Board and Bernard Township to respond filed.
2020-08-06
Waiver of right of respondent Islamic Society of Basking Ridge, Inc. to respond filed.
2020-07-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 31, 2020)
Attorneys
Bernards Township Planning Board and Bernard Township
Brent R. Pohlman — Methfessel & Werbel, P.C., Respondent
Islamic Society of Basking Ridge, Inc.
Robert L. Toll — Hogan Lovells US, LLP, Respondent
Michael S. Barth
Michael S. Barth — Petitioner