No. 19-99
Northern Kentucky Area Development District v. Danielle Snyder
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)
Tags: arbitration-agreement contract-defense employer-employee employment-contract equal-treatment federal-arbitration-act kentucky-revised-statutes preemption state-law
Key Terms:
Arbitration JusticiabilityDoctri
Arbitration JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2019-11-08
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) preempts Ky. Rev. Stat. § 336.700(2), which invalidates arbitration agreements between an employer and an employee, or whether the statute instead presents a "generally applicable contract defense" that can withstand preemption under the FAA.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) preempts Ky. Rev. Stat. § 336.700(2), which invalidates arbitration agreements between an employer and an employee, or whether the statute instead presents a 'generally applicable contract defense' that can withstand preemption under the FAA
Docket Entries
2019-11-12
Petition DENIED.
2019-10-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/8/2019.
2019-10-18
Reply of petitioner Northern Kentucky Area Development District filed.
2019-10-07
Brief of respondent Danielle Snyder in opposition filed.
2019-09-09
Response Requested. (Due October 9, 2019)
2019-08-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-08-14
Waiver of right of respondent Danielle Snyder to respond filed.
2019-07-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 19, 2019)
Attorneys
Danielle Snyder
Shane Christian Sidebottom — Ziegler & Schneider, P.S.C., Respondent
Northern Kentucky Area Development District
Jeffrey C. Mando — Adam Stepner Woltermann & Dusing, Petitioner