No. 19-959
TAMKO Building Products, Inc. v. Daniel Williams, et al.
Amici (1)
Experienced Counsel
Tags: agency-law arbitration-agreements equal-footing equal-footing-principle federal-arbitration-act jury-trial-rights practical-impact state-agency-law state-court-hostility state-courts
Key Terms:
Arbitration JusticiabilityDoctri
Arbitration JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2020-05-01
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the Federal Arbitration Act permits state courts to craft state principles of agency law that uniquely disfavor arbitration (in the guise of uniquely protecting jury-trial rights) and use those principles to refuse to enforce arbitration agreements.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Federal Arbitration Act permits state courts to craft state principles of agency law that uniquely disfavor arbitration
Docket Entries
2020-05-04
Petition DENIED.
2020-04-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/1/2020.
2020-04-14
Reply of petitioner TAMKO Building Products, Inc. filed. (Distributed)
2020-04-01
Brief of respondents Daniel Williams, et al. in opposition filed.
2020-03-02
Brief amicus curiae of Center for the Rule of Law filed.
2020-02-21
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including April 1, 2020.
2020-02-19
Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 2, 2020 to April 1, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-01-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 2, 2020)
2019-12-06
Application (19A631) granted by Justice Sotomayor extending the time to file until January 29, 2020.
2019-12-05
Application (19A631) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from December 30, 2019 to January 29, 2020, submitted to Justice Sotomayor.
Attorneys
Center for the Rule of Law
Thomas Ryan McCarthy — Consovoy McCarthy PLLC, Amicus
Daniel Williams, et al.
Karla Ann Gilbride — Public Justice, P.C., Respondent
TAMKO Building Products, Inc.
Paul D. Clement — Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Petitioner