No. 19-953
Charles Farrar v. Dean Williams, Executive Director, Colorado Department of Corrections, et al.
Tags: circuit-split constitutional-law criminal-conviction due-process judicial-review material-evidence perjured-testimony perjury post-conviction-relief prosecutorial-misconduct
Latest Conference:
2020-09-29
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the Due Process Clause is violated when the prosecution relies on material, perjured testimony to secure a conviction but did not know the testimony was perjured until after the trial, as six courts have held, or whether the prosecution's contemporaneous knowledge of the perjured testimony is required, as eight courts have held.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Due Process Clause is violated when the prosecution relies on material, perjured testimony to secure a conviction but did not know the testimony was perjured until after the trial
Docket Entries
2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-06-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-06-17
Reply of petitioner Charles Farrar filed. (Distributed)
2020-06-03
Brief of respondents Dean Williams, et al. in opposition filed.
2020-05-04
Response Requested. (Due June 3, 2020)
2020-04-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/15/2020.
2020-04-22
Waiver of right of respondent Dean Williams, et al. to respond filed.
2020-03-02
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including May 1, 2020.
2020-02-26
Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 2, 2020 to May 1, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-01-27
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 2, 2020)
2019-11-26
Application (19A587) granted by Justice Sotomayor extending the time to file until January 27, 2020.
2019-11-13
Application (19A587) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from November 27, 2019 to January 26, 2020, submitted to Justice Sotomayor.
Attorneys
Charles Farrar
Catherine Emily Stetson — Hogan Lovells US LLP, Petitioner
Dean Williams, et al.
L. Andrew Cooper — Office of the Colorado Attorney General, Respondent