Does a consumer have the right to exercise federal TILA rescission protection where applicable state law has defined his ownership interest in a way that activates that protection, or may a federal circuit court of appeal deny that protection by relying on a term atextual to the Act, such that its decision directly conflicts with the property rights decisions rendered by a state's highest court?

Does a consumer have the right to exercise federal TILA rescission protection where applicable state law has defined his ownership interest in a way that activates that protection, or may a federal circuit court of appeal deny that protection by relying on a term atextual to the Act, such that its decision directly conflicts with the property rights decisions rendered by a state's highest court?