No. 19-901
Devon Drive Lionville, LP, et al. v. Parke Bank, et al.
Tags: causation-chain chain-of-causation civil-rico fdic fdic-regulation mail-fraud proximate-cause wire-fraud
Latest Conference:
2020-06-04
Question Presented (from Petition)
What standards and criteria are appropriate in a civil RICO case to determine whether proximate cause exists for a plaintiff who is not the direct recipient of the mail or wire fraud, and therefore is not within the "first step" of the chain causation?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
What standards and criteria are appropriate in a civil RICO case to determine whether proximate cause exists for a plaintiff who is not the direct recipient of the mail or wire fraud, and therefore is not within the 'first step' of the chain causation?
Docket Entries
2020-06-08
Petition DENIED.
2020-05-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/4/2020.
2020-03-24
Reply of petitioners Devon Drive Lionville, LP, et al. filed.
2020-03-12
Brief of respondents Parke Bank, Vito Pantilione and Ralph Gallo in opposition filed.
2020-02-19
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including March 12, 2020.
2020-02-18
Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 20, 2020 to March 12, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-01-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 20, 2020)
Attorneys
Devon Drive Lionville, LP, et al.
Robert Toland II — O'Hagan Meyer LLP, Petitioner
Parke Bank, Vito Pantilione and Ralph Gallo
David L. Braverman — Braverman Kaskey PC, Respondent
Peter J. Leyh — Braverman Kaskey, Respondent