Did the Second Circuit err in holding that a complaint for copyright infringement must be dismissed unless it alleges particular facts showing "1) which specific original works are the subject of the copyright claim, 2) that plaintiff owns the copyrights in those works, 3) that the copyrights have been registered in accordance with the statute, and 4) [as now required by the Second Circuit but not by the Third and Seventh Circuits] by what acts during what time the defendant infringed the copyright"?

Did the Second Circuit err in holding that a complaint for copyright infringement must be dismissed unless it alleges particular facts showing specific-works,copyright-ownership,copyright-registration,unauthorized-copying