I. The district court applied a two-level enhancement for maintaining a drug house. This was applied despite no evidence being presented that Mr. Leggett's primary or principal purpose for maintaining a premises was for drug activity. Did the district court improperly apply the enhancement and did the appellate court improperly affirm the trial court?

Whether the district court improperly applied a two-level enhancement for maintaining a drug house where there was no evidence that the defendant's primary or principal purpose for maintaining the premises was for drug activity, and whether the appellate court improperly affirmed the trial court's application of the enhancement